Chances are at some point you’ve seen a statue or painting depicting the personification of the concept of justice as a woman holding a set of scales in one hand (usually her left) and an unsheathed sword in her other hand (usually her right), often wearing a blindfold over her eyes. Statues depicting Justice in this manner often stand outside courthouses across Europe and the Americas. Many people have wondered why she is personified as a woman and some have tried to attribute great allegorical or symbolic significance to her gender. Some have imagined, for instance, that maybe men find women desirable and men created the personification of Justice, so they made her a woman to show that Justice is desirable. This may sound like a compelling and common-sense answer, but it is still wrong.
In reality, Justice is personified as a woman not for any profound allegorical or symbolic reason, but rather simply because the respective nouns denoting the concept of “justice” in the Ancient Greek and Latin languages happen to be grammatically feminine. In this post, I will discuss the origin of the personification Justice and the history of how she came to have the standard iconography that she has today.
The ancient Greek divine personifications of justice
In the Ancient Greek language, a noun can have any of three possible grammatical genders, which are: feminine, masculine, and neuter. The ancient Greeks often personified abstract concepts as deities. When they did this, they generally used the noun that denoted the concept as the name for the deity and kept the gender of the deity the same as the grammatical gender of the noun they personified. Thus, if the noun denoting the concept was grammatically masculine, the divine personification would be a male god and, if the noun was grammatically feminine, the divine personification would be a goddess.
There are a few divine personifications in Greek mythology that are male, such as Ζῆλος (Zêlos), the divine personification of envy or emulation, and Κράτος (Krátos), the divine personification of strength, power, or authority. (I discuss the divine personification Kratos and his appearances in ancient Greek literature at great length in this post I wrote in March 2020.) Most nouns denoting abstract concepts in Ancient Greek, however, are grammatically feminine. This includes both of the most common nouns for “justice.”
The word θέμις (thémis), a third-declension feminine noun, typically refers to primordial, divinely-established justice. Meanwhile, the word δίκη (díkē), a first-declension feminine noun, typically refers to justice based on human laws, institutions, and jurisprudence. Because both of these nouns are grammatically feminine, the ancient Greeks personified both concepts as goddesses: the goddess Themis and the goddess Dike.
The ancient Greek poet Hesiodos of Askre, who most likely flourished in around the early seventh century BCE and whose poems are considered to be among the oldest in the Greek language that have survived to the present day, relates the two concepts together by describing Dike as the daughter of Themis and the god Zeus, along with a whole host of other divine personifications, in his Theogonia 901–906. He declares:
“δεύτερον ἠγάγετο λιπαρὴν Θέμιν, ἣ τέκεν Ὥρας,
Εὐνουμίην τε Δίκην τε καὶ Εἰρήνην τεθαλυῖαν,
αἳ ἔργ᾽ ὠρεύουσι καταθνητοῖσι βροτοῖσι,
Μοίρας θ᾽, ᾗ πλείστην τιμὴν πόρε μητίετα Ζεύς,
Κλωθώ τε Λάχεσίν τε καὶ Ἄτροπον, αἵτε διδοῦσι
θνητοῖς ἀνθρώποισιν ἔχειν ἀγαθόν τε κακόν τε.”
This means, in my own translation:
“Next he [i.e., Zeus] married shining Themis, who bore the Horai [the “Seasons”]:
Eunomia [“Good Order”], Dike [“Justice”], and burgeoning Eirene [“Peace”],
who attend to the deeds of mortal humans,
and the Moirai [“Fates”], to whom counselor Zeus gave the most honor:
Klotho and Lachesis and Atropos, who give
to mortal human beings both the good thing and the bad thing to have.”
The ancient Greeks often imagined both Dike and Themis as holding a set of scales, which represent the weighing of evidence in favor of competing arguments. The ancient Greek lyric poet Bakchylides (lived c. 518 – c. 451 BCE) makes the earliest known reference to Dike having a set of scales in his Epinikos 4.11–13. There, he declares:
“ἔτι δὲ τέ]τρατον, εἴ τις ὀρθὰ
θεὸς] εἷλκε Δίκας τάλαν[τα,
Δεινομένεός κ᾿ ἐγερα[ίρ]ομεν υἱόν.”
This means, in my own translation:
“But still, if some deity had held correctly
the scales of Dike,
then a fourth time we would be honoring the son of Deinomenes.”
The most famous surviving ancient Greek artistic depiction of Themis is a Pentelic marble statue made by the sculptor Chairestratos son of Charedemos sometime around 300 BCE or thereabouts that was discovered at the site of Rhamnous in 1890 and is now held in the National Archaeological Museum in Athens. Themis’s left hand in the statue is believed to have originally held a set of scales, but the scales themselves have not survived. Her right hand, which is broken off, is believed to have originally held a phiale, a kind of bowl meant for pouring offerings to the deities.
ABOVE: Photograph from Wikimedia Commons showing an ancient Greek Pentelic marble statue of the goddess Themis dating to c. 300 BCE, found at the site of Rhamnous, now held in the National Archaeological Museum in Athens
The Roman personification Iūstitia
The word for “justice” in Latin is the first-declension feminine noun iūstitia. The ancient Romans therefore adopted the Greek divine personification Dike and gave her the Latin name Iūstitia. The ancient Romans regularly depicted Iūstitia as holding a set of scales in one hand, representing the symbolic weighing of competing arguments, and a cornucopia in the other, representing the abundance and prosperity that come through justice.
The Romans also personified the word aequitās, which is a third-declension feminine noun meaning “evenness,” “equity,” or “impartiality,” as a goddess with more-or-less identical iconography to Iūstitia. Both Iūstitia and Aequitās appear frequently on imperial Roman coins, sometimes with the exact same iconography in the exact same position, indicating that the two goddesses were seen as basically interchangeable, if not identical.
ABOVE: Photos showing the obverse (left) and reverse (right) of a silver denarius minted at some point between 193 and 194 CE by the Roman emperor Pescennius Niger, depicting the goddess Iūstitia on the reverse holding a set of scales and a cornucopia
Iūstitia in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Period
Although the Roman Empire gradually converted to Christianity over the course of the fourth and fifth centuries CE, writers and artists continued to use the personification of Iūstitia as a woman holding a set of scales and this is the source for the modern western personification of Justice. By the Late Middle Ages, it was standard to depict her holding a set of scales in one hand (usually her left) and an unsheathed sword in the other (usually her right), representing the enforcement of justice through state-sanctioned violence.
The oldest known depiction of Justice wearing a blindfold is a satirical woodcut illustration, possibly made by the German Renaissance artist Albrecht Dürer, published in 1494 in the book Das Narrenschiff or The Ship of Fools by Sebastian Brant. Contrary to the modern celebratory portrayal of Justice wearing a blindfold to indicate her objective impartiality, in the illustration in Brant’s book, the blindfold is clearly meant as a critique—portraying Justice as blind to the rampant iniquity taking place all around her.
ABOVE: Satirical woodcut illustration printed in 1494 in Sebastian Brant’s Das Narrenschiff of Ship of Fools, the oldest known depiction of Justice wearing a blindfold
Other artists in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries made other interesting innovations in their portrayals of Justice. For instance, although most artists of this period depicted Justice as fully clothed, the eminent German Renaissance painter Lucas Cranach the Elder (lived c. 1472 – 1553) made not one, but two different paintings depicting Justice as basically completely naked.
In both paintings, Justice wears only elaborate jewelry and a nearly invisible gossamer gown. The gossamer gown is most likely an attempt on Cranach’s part to appease the moral sensibilities of his time, which held that “respectable” women should never be depicted fully nude, while still fulfilling his own desire to paint Justice as a naked goddess.
ABOVE: Justice as a Naked Woman with a Sword and Balance, painted in 1537 by the German Renaissance painter Lucas Cranach the Elder
Cranach’s portrayal of Justice as naked does not seem to have caught on—but, for whatever reason, the portrayal from Brant’s Narrenschiff of Justice wearing a blindfold did.
The oldest surviving statue depicting Justice wearing a blindfold as an apparent celebration of the law’s impartiality is the statue made by the Swiss sculptor Hans Gieng in around 1543, which stood atop the Gerechtigkeitsbrunnen or Fountain of Justice in Bern, Switzerland, for over four hundred years. Some vandals destroyed Gieng’s original statue in 1986, so the statue that stands atop the fountain today is an exact modern replica of his original.
ABOVE: Photograph from Wikimedia Commons showing the modern replica of Hans Gieng’s statue of Justice atop the Gerechtigkeitsbrunnen or Fountain of Justice in Bern, Switzerland
Conclusion: the personification Justice today
Modern artistic depictions of Justice nearly always depict her holding a set of scales and an unsheathed sword, which are the oldest attributes associated with her that are still a consistent part of her modern iconography, but they vary whether they show her wearing a blindfold.
Unlike medieval and early modern depictions of Justice, modern depictions usually show her in classicizing attire, deliberately harkening back to her origin as a Greek and Roman goddess. Some depictions show her wearing a Greek chiton, while others show her wearing a stola, the type of dress normally worn by married Roman women. Some statues also depict her wearing a cloak over her dress.
ABOVE: Photograph from Wikimedia Commons showing a statue of Justice wearing a blindfold, a belted Roman stola, and a cloak outside the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong (left) and photograph from Wikimedia Commons showing a statue of Justice wearing a belted Greek chiton without a blindfold or cloak outside the Supreme Court of Queensland in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (right)
Prefer the Das Narrenschiff interpretation of blindfold, appropriate in cases that favor the wrong party because of how broken the court system can be.
This was very interesting! Another deity/symbol with similar iconography is Lady Fortune. At least in Italian pop culture she is sometimes portrayed with blindfold and scales along with the classic cornucopia
I hadn’t heard that Fortune is sometimes portrayed holding a set of scales in Italian popular culture. That’s certainly not part of Fortune’s traditional iconography. Traditionally, she’s associated with the cornucopia, the rota Fortunae or “wheel of Fortune,” a ship’s rudder, and a ball. She’s sometimes shown wearing a blindfold, but, when she is, she is traditionally iconographically distinguished from Justice by the fact that she is not holding a set of scales. If what you say here is correct, then it’s possible that Italian pop culture may have conflated Justice and Fortune together, perhaps due in part to the fact that they are both sometimes depicted wearing a blindfold.
I’m so sorry, both for responding rather late and for making a mistake in my comment! I mostly remembered this from reading Italian comic books, but when I went back to look it turns out the scales were just my memory playing a trick on me. She is wearing a blindfold but as you say, she does not carry scales. Thanks for correcting me, my bad
It’s ok! There’s no need to apologize! We all make mistakes. I know I’ve made mistakes. I do my absolute best to avoid them, but they still happen. As for the “late” response, I don’t consider it late at all. Besides, I don’t expect you to owe me your time; you leave comments here of your own free will and you have every right to leave them at your own pace.
(WordPress does seem to have set up a time limit for leaving comments on articles, but I think the time limit is thirty or thirty-one days. It’s currently only been a few days since I made this post and comments for this post will not close until the end of this month.)
Thank you! I see
“By the Late Middle Ages, it was standard to depict her holding a set of scales in one hand (usually her left) and an unsheathed sword in the other (usually her right), representing the enforcement of justice through state-sanctioned violence.”
Interesting. I suppose this is because by that time, State power was increasingly becoming centralized, and trying to control people’s lives more than it ever had since the Roman era. It’s puzzling that this iconographic shift didn’t happen during the Dominate period of Rome though.
This shift from local custom and local community justice or even personal revenge-seeking to the modern police-state system is also the theme of an interesting German story by Ewald von Kleist “Michael Kohlhaas”
Also, this was a time of extreme social upheaval and increasing poverty and insecurity, so it’s no wonder Sebastian Brand decided to depict justice as blind.
Also, this means that Themistocles just means “the glory of divine justice” and “Theodicy” comes from dike?
As of right now, I don’t actually know exactly when the earliest known depiction of Justice holding an unsheathed sword dates to. The Wikipedia article “Lady Justice” claims that the “earliest Roman coins” depict her holding a sword, but I haven’t actually been able to find any Roman depictions of her holding a sword myself. However she first came to be depicted holding a sword, this iconography certainly had become standard by the Late Middle Ages by the time Sebastian Brant’s Narrenschiff was published.
You’re close, but slightly off regarding the etymology of the name Θεμιστοκλῆς (Themistoklês). It actually comes from θεμιστός (themistós), an adjective derived from the noun θέμις (thémis) that means something like “in accordance with divine law” or just “lawful” more generally, plus the suffix -κλῆς (-klês), which of course comes from κλέος (kléos), which means “glory.” The name therefore means something like “glory in accordance with divine law.”
You’re absolutely on the mark regarding the etymology of the word theodicy, though; it does indeed come from θεός (theós), meaning “deity,” plus δίκη (díkē), meaning “justice.” It therefore means something like “deity-justice” or “god-justice.”
Since you’ve noticed me, I’d like to draw your attention to a guy called Lloyd DeMause.
He’s a pseudoscholar whose writings are available for free online, and I’m worried that they might easily be used by white supremacists as propaganda, since he himself doesn’t support white supremacist policies, at least consciously or overtly, which could make him seem neutral or objective.
He has some absolutely awful takes on world history in general, and I’ve debunked what I could of his ideas, but I was wondering if you could do something about his drivel regarding the ancient Mediterranean?
If you have time of course.
His entire spiel could be described as Steven Pinker on high-quality crack. Whiggism taken to its utmost extreme, and based on a kind of pseudo-psychology and pseudo-history. Basically, according to DeMause, everyone throughout history treated children appallingly(systematic torture, near-universal rape and mutilation etc.), practically without exception, and hunter-gatherers such as the Australian Aborigines were by far the worst. Then a succession of various Germanic Protestants gradually invented basic human decency and created all that is good in the world from about the mid 1600s to today.
You could see how this is useful ammunition for white supremacy.
Here’s a blogpost I wrote debunking some of his claims, as well as a reddit post I wrote, which is better organized and contains a representative selection from the data.
https://myblogagainstdemausesbadscience.blogspot.com/2022/01/a-critique-of-universality-of-incest-as.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/uny1dn/is_lloyd_demause_right_that_before_the_19th/iarssra/?context=3
Believe me, I always read your comments. I read every comment that anyone leaves on this site. If I do not reply to your comment, it’s not because I haven’t read it, but rather either because I do not have time to leave a reply at the time I happen to see it or because I cannot think of anything to say as a response.
I think you’ve suggested before that I should write something debunking this guy. I will try to look into him, but bear in mind that I already have a whole bunch of articles I’m currently working on that I’m hoping to finish this summer.
What are those articles on?
A few of the articles I’m hoping to post this summer include an article about what angels really look like according to the Bible (in which I will debunk the popular meme that “Biblically accurate angels” are terrifying Lovecraftian nightmares), an article about what people really did at ancient Greek orgia, an article debunking the claim that Christians copied Jesus off the Phrygian mythical figure Attis, an article debunking the idea that the ancient Greeks imagined Aphrodite as a “dumb blond,” and a whole bunch of others.
Not related to this specific article, but something I’d be interested to know; why do you close comments on articles after approximately a month? I’m sure you have good reasons for it, and I’m not trying to get you to change your practice. I just wonder why it is the way it is. Many of your older articles have comments on them dating to months after they were posted, so what made you add the time limit?
I actually did not add a time limit. WordPress seems to have added the time limit for some reason without me doing anything. I have no idea why they added it, but I actually kind of like it because it ensures that the people who leave comments are usually people who regularly follow my posts and there are not as many random troll comments as there used to be.
Also, consider Aratus’ Phaenomena: https://www.theoi.com/Text/AratusPhaenomena.html
In which the daughter of Astraeus, the constellation Virgo (Astraea?) is equated with Justice/Dike. Virgo *is* next to the scales of Libra. May have been the reason Dike was depicted like that (but any astrotheology, always with a pinch of salt).
Hi Spencer,
The scales were a common feature of the ancient Egyptian ‘weighing of the heart’ ceremony which dates back to at least to the Middle Kingdom, 2000 BCE or earlier.
Osiris, god of the underworld, presides over the ceremony which is conducted by Anubis, the dog/jackal headed god. The deceased’s heart is weighed against the ostrich feather of Ma’at, the female personification of ‘truth’. If the heart is lighter than the feather, off to the ‘two fields’, (paradise), you go. If heavier, then the heart is devoured by Ammit the crocodile/hippo/lion and the soul ceases to exist.
I see echoes of the Divine Judgement of Christianity in this much older Egyptian tradition.
Given that the early Greeks held Egypt in such high esteem, do you think that they have ‘borrowed’ this concept from there? And also did this Greek idea then slide over to early Christianity?
Just discovered your blog recently – interesting stuff! Looking forward to the article on angels.
Thank you so much! I’m looking forward to posting the article on angels myself. It’s one that I actually started working on months ago.