The Ancient Greeks Invented the Fashion Doll Over 2,500 Years Before Barbie

In my characteristic fashion, I am behind on contemporary popular culture. The movie Barbie, directed by Greta Gerwig, came out in July of this year while I was in Greece. It attracted much discussion online and became both the highest-grossing film of this year and the highest-grossing comedy film of all time, but I only just recently watched it for the first time on HBO Max, over five months after it came out. Overall, I found it entertaining and surprisingly thoughtful for a comedy based on a brand of children’s toy.

The film begins with a parody documentary sequence in which the disembodied narrator (played by Helen Mirren) hyperbolically claims that, before Barbie, the only dolls that ever existed were baby dolls. I expect that most viewers will easily recognize this claim as satire, but, in case anyone takes it seriously, I thought I should point out that dolls of adult women with fully articulable joints who could be dressed in various outfits were actually all the rage among children in ancient Greece two thousand five hundred years ago. We know this because literally hundreds of dolls of this kind have survived to the present day and, today, they are held in museum collections all over the world.

The opening scene of Barbie

For those who have not seen it, the film Barbie begins with a parody of the famous opening scene of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey that also parodies the kind of overdramatic, self-congratulatory documentary that Mattel (the toy company that sells Barbie products) might produce that would inflate Barbie’s importance in world history. While the screen shows a self-consciously anachronistic scene of little girls in twentieth-century clothing playing with baby dolls in a primitive landscape, Helen Mirren’s voice narrates:

“Since the beginning of time, since the first little girl ever existed, there have been dolls. But the dolls were always and forever baby dolls. The girls who played with them could only ever play at being mothers, which can be fun—at least for a while, anyway. (Ask your mother.) This continued until. . .”

The film then shows the appearance of Margot Robbie as a giant Barbie dressed in a 1950s-style bathing suit, towering over all the girls to the sound of the famous opening fanfare of Richard Strauss’s 1896 tone poem “Also spracht Zarathustra.”

If audiences had any doubt about the spuriousness of the narrative this opening sequence tells, the rest of the film makes it abundantly clear that at least the central claim at the end of this sequence—that Barbie has solved all women’s problems—is completely false. The rest of the sequence is similarly historically incorrect and the surviving ancient Greek dolls are proof of this.

ABOVE: Screenshot of the giant Barbie towering over the little girls from the opening sequence of the 2023 film Barbie

Literary evidence for ancient Greek girls playing with dolls

The most common words for “doll” in Ancient Greek are κόρη (kórē), which literally means “girl” or “maiden,” δαγύς (dagýs), and πλαγγών (plangṓn). Unusually, one of the main pieces of literary evidence for girls playing with dolls is actually a first-hand account written by a woman who describes how she herself played with dolls as a little girl.

Erinna was an ancient Greek poet who most likely flourished sometime in the fourth century BCE. Her best-known work is her poem The Distaff, a lament for her close childhood friend Baukis, who died shortly after her marriage. Although much of this poem has been lost, a large portion of it has survived. At one point in it, Erinna fondly remembers how, when she and Baukis were little, they played together with dolls in their bedrooms. She says (in lines 21–22):

“δαγύ[δ]ων τ᾿ ἐχ[όμεσθα νεαν]ίδες ἐν θαλάμοισι
νύμ[φαι]σιν [προσόμοιοι ἀκηδ]έες·”

This means:

“When we were little girls, we clung to dolls in our bedrooms,
acting like brides, without worries.”

This description is one of the clearest pieces of written evidence that the dolls we find in the archaeological record are toys that children actually played with, rather than merely decorative or ritual objects.

ABOVE: Photograph from Wikimedia Commons of PSI 1090, a papyrus fragment bearing a portion of the text of Erinna’s Distaff

Marriage, death, and dolls

Erinna’s poem indicates that little girls played with dolls, but other evidence reveals what happened to those dolls when the girls who owned them grew up.

As I discuss in this blog post I made in February 2023, ancient Greek parents typically forced their daughters to marry when they were between the ages of fifteen and nineteen years old. The groom at an ancient Greek wedding was usually at least a decade older than the bride he was marrying and sometimes much older than that. The philosopher Aristotle of Stageira (lived 384 – 322 BCE) writes in his Politics 7.1335a that the ideal age for a girl to marry is when she is eighteen and the ideal age for a man is when he is thirty-seven.

All marriages were arranged between the bride’s father and the prospective groom. How much say a girl had in which man she married probably varied greatly depending on region, time period, and her father’s particular inclinations.

The ancient Greeks regarded a girl’s marriage as her coming-of-age ceremony. Until marriage, a girl was considered a παρθένος (parthénos) or “virgin,” but, when a man married her and sexually penetrated her for the first time, then she became a γυνή (gynḗ), meaning “woman” or “wife.” For a girl, marriage also entailed a fundamental change in her living situation. Upon marrying, a girl would move out of her parents’ house for the first time and go to live in her husband’s house.

ABOVE: Detail of an Attic red-figure vase painting dating to the fifth century BCE depicting a woman preparing a young bride (who is labeled with her name Thalea) for her wedding

If a girl died before she was able to marry, then her family would usually bury her with her childhood toys, including dolls, which, as toys in the shape of adult women, symbolized both the child that she would forever remain and the adult woman that she might have become if she had lived.

Archaeological excavations of tombs of ancient Greek girls who died before marriage have found many examples of toys that these girls played with while they were alive. Unfortunately, toys that were made of highly perishable materials like cloth or wood rarely survive from the ancient world, except in Egypt where the dry climate sometimes enables their preservation, but many ancient toys made of longer-lasting materials like clay, bone, ivory, and glass have survived.

If, on the other hand, a girl lived to see her wedding, then it was customary for her to dedicate some of her childhood toys to the goddess Artemis shortly before the wedding ceremony. An anonymous epigram preserved in the Greek Anthology 6.280 describes a girl named Timareta as dedicating her toys, including her dolls, to Artemis:

“Τιμαρέτα πρὸ γάμοιο τὰ τύμπανα, τήν τ᾿ ἐρατεινὴν
σφαῖραν, τόν τε κόμας ῥύτορα κεκρύφαλον,
τάς τε κόρας, Λιμνᾶτι, κόρᾳ κόρα, ὡς ἐπιεικές,
ἄνθετο, καὶ τὰ κορᾶν ἐνδύματ᾿, Ἀρτέμιδι.
Λατῴα, τὺ δὲ παιδὸς ὑπὲρ χέρα Τιμαρετείας
θηκαμένα, σώζοις τὰν ὁσίαν ὁσίως.”

This means (in my own translation):

“Timareta, before her marriage, dedicates to you, Lady of the Lake,
her hand drums, her lovely ball, the hairnet that held her hair,
and her dolls—a kórē for a kórē, as is fitting—
and her doll’s garments, Artemis.
Daughter of Leto, keep your hand over the child Timareteia;
save her purity purely.”

Once dedicated, these toys would typically remain in the goddess’s sanctuary. Consequently, archaeological excavations at ancient sanctuaries to Artemis, such as the one at Brauron near Athens, have uncovered large numbers of ancient girls’ toys, including dolls.

ABOVE: Photo I took of the archaeological site of Brauron when I visited there this summer, showing part of the ruins of the Temple of Artemis itself (foreground) and the stoa that served as an adjunct building to the temple (background)

Surviving ancient Greek dolls

From surviving examples found in graves and sanctuaries, we know that, starting around the early fifth century BCE, craftsmen in the Greek city-state of Corinth began to mass-produce thousands of dolls of adult women made of materials such as clay, bone, and wood with articulated arms and legs. At least in some cases, it is likely that these dolls originally bore strings that a child could use to move her arms and legs like a puppet.

In some cases, the makers of these dolls painted dresses and jewelry directly on the dolls themselves, but, in other cases, the dolls’ owners most likely dressed them in fashionable outfits that have not survived because they were made of cloth, which decomposes more easily than clay and therefore rarely survives to the present day.

ABOVE: Photo from the Metropolitan Museum of Art website of a Greek terracotta doll with articulated joints, in this case with clothes painted on, made in Corinth sometime in the fifth century BCE

ABOVE: Photo from Wikimedia Commons showing a relatively simple Greek terracotta doll with articulable arms and legs, dating to the fifth century BCE, now held in the Getty Villa

Around the middle of the fifth century BCE, Athenian craftsmen began to mass-manufacture more sophisticated dolls with articulated knees instead of or in addition to articulated waists. The higher-end dolls of this kind feature highly realistic-looking facial features and body proportions, were painted in lifelike colors, and sometimes featured gilding.

These higher-end fashion dolls seem to have been popular with girls from wealthy and aristocratic Greek families and are the closest ancient Greek equivalent to modern Barbie dolls. Aesthetically, however, they differ from the “Stereotypical Barbie” type in a number of crucial respects. Notably, while modern Barbie dolls usually have synthetic straight hair attached to their heads, the hair on ancient Greek dolls is invariably molded or carved into the material of the doll itself, is invariably curly in texture, and is often partly covered by a kind of women’s hat known as a sakkos.

This partly reflects a difference between ancient Greek and contemporary U.S. beauty standards. In the contemporary U.S., straight hair is more commonly considered the ideal of beauty, but the ancient Greeks regarded wavy or curly hair, not straight hair, as ideally beautiful. This is why not only their dolls, but also nearly everyone in Greek art has wavy or curly hair. Ancient Greek culture also placed great importance on female modesty and it was common for Greek women to cover their hair at least partly, hence why many of their dolls wear partial hair coverings.

Additionally, while modern Barbie dolls have feet shaped to fit into high-heeled shoes, ancient Greek dolls invariably have flat feet. This is because high-heeled shoes weren’t really fashionable in ancient Greece; if a woman wanted to look taller, she simply wore platform shoes with thick, even soles (see Xenophon, Oikonomikos 10.2).

These kinds of dolls remained popular and beloved among Greek and later Roman girls throughout the rest of classical antiquity.

ABOVE: Photograph by Egisto Sani (posted to Flickr) showing a Greek clay doll of an adult woman holding a pair of krotala (castanets), made in Athens between c. 350 and c. 325 BCE, now held in the Louvre Museum

Author: Spencer McDaniel

I am a historian mainly interested in ancient Greek cultural and social history. Some of my main historical interests include ancient religion and myth; gender and sexuality; ethnicity; and interactions between Greeks and foreign cultures. I hold a BA in history and classical studies (Ancient Greek and Latin languages and literature), with departmental honors in history, from Indiana University Bloomington (May 2022) and an MA in Ancient Greek and Roman Studies from Brandeis University (May 2024).

16 thoughts on “The Ancient Greeks Invented the Fashion Doll Over 2,500 Years Before Barbie”

  1. Fascinating. Thank you, Spencer.

    I wish you success with your PhD applications, you really deserve having your application accepted on account of your enthusiasm and erudition.

    I am actually so impressed by your knowledge of primary sources that it’s really begininnig to annoy me how I only know of history thhrough secondary sources. I have thhus decided to learn a bit of Ancient Greek to understand these sources to some extent. Language learning is my hobby, anyway.

    Can you give tips as to how I should go about it? Obviously you learned Ancient Greek by yourself and through college, but where should someone without any training in history start? Could you perhaps recommend a book?

    1. One of my main goals in writing this blog is to show my readers how historical scholarship is done by “showing my work” as much as possible. That’s the reason why I quote so many primary written sources in the original languages and translate them, include photos of important pieces of archaeological evidence, and analyze the evidence with such attention to detail. I want to demonstrate both the kinds of evidence that are available for us to study and how ancient historians and classicists engage with these kinds of evidence.

      As far as familiarizing yourself with ancient primary sources is concerned, nearly all the sources I quote on this blog are readily available in English translations. Reading sources in translation is a much quicker way to familiarize yourself with them than learning to read Ancient Greek to read these sources in the original language will be.

      That being said, I absolutely encourage anyone who wants to learn Ancient Greek to do so. My general impression is that it is extremely difficult to teach oneself an ancient language on one’s own without a teacher, but one can do it if one is extremely determined and has the right kinds of resources. When I was in high school, I tried to teach myself Ancient Greek using Donald J. Mastronarde’s Introduction to Attic Greek and, when I began taking Ancient Greek courses in undergrad, the introductory textbook we used for class was Andrew Keller and Stephanie Russell’s Learn to Read Greek. I can vouch that both are good textbooks. This past semester, I’ve been tutoring an introductory Ancient Greek student who is using the textbook Athenaze, which is also a very good textbook.

      Keller and Russell’s Learn to Read Greek covers basically every introductory topic exhaustively and goes into great detail even about aspects of the Greek language that are not really important to beginners, so it is a great resource if your goal is to learn all about Ancient Greek. The level of detail, however, can be overwhelming to some beginners and can obscure which parts are really important. Mastronarde’s Introduction to Attic Greek strikes something of a balance between trying to inform readers about the complexities of Greek grammar and vocabulary without watering it down or oversimplifying and also without overwhelming beginners. Athenaze is generally beginner-friendly and the translation exercises form a continuous story with colorful characters.

      1. Thank you for your reply (and your blog in general). I wanted to know, have you learned (or considered learning) any Modern Greek by any chance?

        1. Currently, to my great shame, I cannot honestly claim to know Modern Greek. I only know Modern Greek phonology (i.e., pronunciation of words) and a few basic words and phrases along the lines of “γεια σου,” “ευχαριστώ,” etc. I am able to understand some other words and phrases from my study of Ancient Greek, but I could not hold a conversation in Modern Greek.

          I definitely hope to learn Modern Greek in the future. Unfortunately, the discipline of classics actually makes it hard for aspiring scholars who want to learn Modern Greek to learn it, because all classicists are expected to have mastery of at least five languages: Ancient Greek, Latin, English, German, and French and/or Italian (preferably both). There is no expectation for classicists, even those who specialize in ancient Greece, to know any Modern Greek.

          So far, I speak English as my native language, I took four years of German in high school, and I have taken nine semesters of both Ancient Greek and Latin since I started undergrad, but I still need to continue improving my Ancient Greek, German, and Latin (especially my German and Latin, which I have not focused on as much) and I haven’t even started learning French or Italian yet, at least one of which I will be required to master before the end of the second or third year of my PhD. Thus, as much as I want to learn Modern Greek and as important as I personally consider it for me to do so, I haven’t had time and, unfortunately, probably will not have time in the near future.

  2. Thanks for this article; I learned a lot from this!

    I guess I should also watch the Barbie film sometime. I actually got tickets for it this summer, but due to some technical problem at the cinema it couldn’t be shown. Our friend Gibbor/Wichiteglega saw it several times, if I remember correctly!

    Is ‘Timareteia’ a diminutive/nickname for Timareta?

    Also, do we know if Roman maidens similarly dedicated their dolls to a goddess upon marriage? You mentioned that a similar type of doll was popular in Rome as well.

    1. Barbie is an entertaining film. As one would expect, it’s very corporate, but they gave Greta Gerwig a surprising degree of freedom to poke fun at Mattel.

      Timareteia is an alternate form of Timareta, which is most likely used in the poem for metrical purposes, since, if the poet used Τιμαρέτα at the end of line five, then the line would only have five complete feet plus a dangling syllable. The addition of the ει to the girl’s name adds another long syllable, which allows the final two syllables of the name to form a spondee and therefore complete the hexameter line.

      Yes, Roman girls traditionally dedicated their toys (including dolls) to either Venus or the Lares on the day before their wedding.

      1. As for ‘Timareteia’, good to know! If I remember correctly, Valerius Martial criticised this sort of thing among Greek poets in one of his epigrams. Actual diminutive nicknames seem to me pretty rare in Antiquity, though I have heard that “Sokratidion” is used once in a comedy.

        Thanks also for answering regarding Roman wedding rituals

        1. Unfortunately, I have not seen it yet, mainly because I didn’t see it in the theater either and I don’t know where it is available for streaming. I definitely want to see that one too at some point, though.

  3. Your truly informative article still left me curious if there were equivalent Ken or more likely GI Joe dolls or any record of boys playing with dolls. Also it seems these dolls are not “anatomically correct” like modern dolls, I wonder (rhetorically) if Greek parents made jokes about that the way we do

  4. Nice article, as usual.

    It’s little details like these that truly humanize the people of the past.

  5. Hey Spence!

    Sorry, I know this is off-topic, but if you have a minute, do you think you could share your thoughts on the most recent archaeological excavations at Jericho by Lorenzo Nigro?

    Lorenzo Nigro, “The Italian-Palestinian Expedition to Tell es-Sultan, Ancient Jericho (1997-2015): Archaeology and Valorisation of Material and Immaterial Heritage”, Digging Up Jericho: Past, Present and Future (ed. Rachael Thyrza Sparks et al.).

    The excavation reports seem to challenge many of the older ideas that we had about Jericho in the past (such as that the site was unoccupied for several centuries at the end of the late Bronze Age). I’m just curious to see what your thoughts are on it and how it relates to the archaeology and history of Jericho as a whole (and maybe also the biblical story of Joshua’s conquest).

  6. Eh, it shouldn’t be too surprising. The idea of toys is prehistoric in age and Ancient Greece is known to have inventions plenty would never associate with Ancient Greece.
    PS Your other Pilgrim article here has its comments closed: https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2020/11/26/the-racist-mythology-about-the-pilgrims/
    So I gotta say it’s astonishing how anyone would defend the whitewashed tale when the real story comes with more answers than questions. The First “Thanksgiving” as the high point of Anglo-Wampanoag relations that gets followed up with the conquest of Pequot land and King Phillip is way more compelling and sets the stage for American conquest of Native territory way better. Comparing Plymouth Colony Pilgrims with samurai looks like it’s way more accurate than comparing them with modern Americans; In the sense of similar habits of fighting against their neighbors, indulging in brutality that their successors tend to whitewash, and because pilgrims and samurai actually coexisted. Also, I like Tisquantum better than Squanto.
    PPS Your dinosaur article here is pretty compelling: https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2022/08/18/does-the-word-dinosaur-really-mean-terrible-lizard/
    As someone who’s just as into prehistoric creatures as human history, “formidable” is indeed a better translation than terrible. Reminds me of Ivan the Terrible who should really be called Ivan the Formidable, Great, or Awesome.
    PPPS To add something to your US foundation article here: https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2020/11/22/when-does-united-states-history-really-begin/
    I wonder what it would mean to cite 1789 as the beginning of the United States, like I do citing Washington’s inauguration as the first President.
    PPPPS I use BC and AD rather than BCE and CE.

Comments are closed.